There’s More To Research Than Wikipedia

As freelance writers and ghostwriters, we often need to do quick internet research on topics we may know very little about.  If we’re going to be professionals, then we have to find a way to decide whether the information we use is really reliable (Wikipedia may have a lot of information, but who knows if it’s trustworthy?) Finding information you can trust gets more and more difficult, as there is more information to wade through every day.  Google may help you find information, but you still need to evaluate it.

When I was teaching journalism, I prepared a lecture on verifying internet resources, then promptly lost the reference. Luckily, I’ve found something similar again – this article on

Evaluating Internet Resources – Georgetown University Library

Unlike similar information found in newspapers or television broadcasts, information available on the Internet is not regulated for quality or accuracy; therefore, it is particularly important for the individual Internet user to evaluate the resource or information

Though it may be time consuming, you could use it to build  a list of trusted sources that would be your first stop when doing some new research.




Share this post on: Facebook / StumbleUpon / Delicious / Twitter
Or get updates via our RSS, EMAIL or Podcast feed.

Like this post? Read more:
  • Are You A Buttoned-Up or Buttoned-Down Freelance Writer?
  • Google Alerts: A Great Freelance Writing Tool
  • Great Advice On Web Content Writing
  • 4 Responses to There’s More To Research Than Wikipedia
    1. Whoa
      August 8, 2007 | 14:42

      Wikia, Incorporated, is a seperate for-profit company owned by Jimbo Wales. It’s funny how ALL of Wikipedia has “nofollow” on their URLs… except to Wikia.com and Amazon.com external links (Amazon invested $10,000,000 in Wikipedia, public record).

      Why is that?

    2. Rob O.
      August 8, 2007 | 20:22

      Learning to use search engines to mine for information and cross-reference resources is something that comes with practise & time. Wikipedia isn’t a bad jumping off point, just be sure to validate those findings. Often, the linked references at the bottom of Wikipedia articles are much more in-depth sources of much more reliable information.

    3. Sharon
      August 14, 2007 | 14:05

      Yes, I think that’s the important thing, Rob. Cross checking is essential to make sure you have really reliable information.

    4. Keyword
      January 18, 2010 | 13:18

      Thanks for your advice! Luckily I did not only use Wikipedia as my reference and resource when writing. I have lots of books available in my mini library in my house, I usually used also search engines like Google to search to search related topics for my writing.

    Leave a Reply


    Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

    CommentLuv Enabled

    Trackback URL http://www.getpaidtowriteonline.com/theres-more-to-research-than-wikipedia/trackback/