No Responses to “The Eco Friendly Writer”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Excellent post, Sharon! The first time I stumbled onto the ability to rewrite something, I was astounded. I keep everything I write just in case I need a chunk of it later. When I write a large project with similar keywords I often grab a chunk from one piece to rewrite and start another. It never ends up looking the same and gives me a bit of a head start.
    Cheers,
    Dana

  2. Me too, Dana. You just never know when you will need it and it’s a real time saver when it comes to research.

  3. About recycling–I just entered into a contract with a magazine that allows me to sell work I do for them elsewhere “as long as the lede and some other content is changed.” (Vague, huh?) In this type of situation, if I’m only reworking the lede (and, say, 10-15% of the body of the piece) am I selling a reprint or am I selling a reWRITE?

    I know not to pitch the same exact article to two competing magazines but beyond that I’m stumped. Advice?

  4. Hi Sharon – Thanks for an interesting point of view: Could have been titled “The Three Rs Revisited.”

  5. Great Post!
    I’ve never thought of using the 3 Rs for writing.
    Thanks for sharing, I’ll give it a try next time.

  6. Great post, interesting point of view. I’m now sitting here contemplating the amount of paper I’ve wasted over the years. Talk about leaving my mark on the world.

  7. Wonderful eco-spun tips, Sharon!

    One thing to remember when reprinting is to double check which rights have already been sold.

    In a way writing is fantastic because some of what we’ve written has the potential to continue earning years after it’s initial print if it’s put to work by a resourceful writer. Now, of course, my mind is running over my archives to see if there is anything there worth submitting for reprints or reworking on a new angle.

  8. Well, it’s definitely not a reprint, since that would be the identical article. I think you’re selling a rewrite, but I suspect that most editors would be upset that 85% of the article had appeared elsewhere, so I’d be inclined to rewrite the whole thing. Of course, if they know what they’re getting and it’s ok, then that’s a different matter. Hope this helps, Rachel.

  9. You’re right, Bobbie. That’s a good title. :)

  10. Thanks, Suhada. It works, doesn’t it?

  11. Thanks, Claire. You’re not alone there – when I first worked in magazines, we wasted a criminal amount of paper. I’ve now gone to the other extreme and only print when I really need to.

  12. Good point, Rebecca – thanks for mentioning that. I use that technique often. Sometimes it’s just a matter of taking an old article, starting at a different point and seeing where that leads you.

Leave A Comment...

CommentLuv Enabled