22 Responses to “First Experience With GetAFreelancer”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. But the big question is… You lucked out once on GAF. Do you really think there is potential to make money versus the time you’ll have to spend posting continually to beat out the 1$ writers?

    GAF was bad back then. It’s still bad now. I think all writers should stay away from the place, because it’s a definite arena where 98% of the buyers don’t give a crap about quality work.

    I do commend you for landing a good job, though.

  2. It’s a minefield, all right, James. I spend maybe a minute or two every couple of of days to see if any job that has a decent budget. If I can’t find one, then I move on. As I said, most of the projects pay so low that most writers would prefer to avoid them – myself included. :)

  3. You know, Rent-a-coder isn’t bad. It won’t bring in great wealth, but it has a fair chance. Definitely more than GAF.

  4. Yes, James, that’s another site I’m working on, but I haven’t had much luck with it so far. I hope to be able to post a similar review in the near future. (What can I say? I’m an optimist!)

  5. I am glad to read this review as I was thinking about GAF as a choice bidding site. I’ve heard good things about Guru and RAC though. I have been contemplating bidding sites but am thinking about doing more advertising so clients can find me and decide they want to work with me instead of my having to do the bidding. I do like the idea of escrow though because when dealing with someone new the worry about being stiffed is always a concern. Glad you had a good experience and with the positive review I bet you’ll get more out of it in future.

  6. WFU

    I started to do this and then backed out of it because of the pay rates on the site. I guess that if you select the right opportunity, it would be well worth it. Even if you pay for only one month at $12 and find a few jobs that you like, then paying for the service would defiantly benefit you.

  7. Yes, that’s what I figured, WFU. The fee was a small percentage of what I earned.

  8. Jeana

    What a fair review. I have been doing copywriting since October. I have had pretty good expriences except for a few misunderstandings due to my own bad habit of not taking the time to read directions. I’m working hard to overcome it.

    My current job I paid a fee of $25.00 for but I am really enjoying the topics. Actually I only do topics I like. Once I mistakenly bid on a project that I thought was one amount of pay and it turned out that it was so pathetically low that after paying the $5 for the fee, I earned about $3.99. I still felt compelled to do a good job. After all, it was my own error.

    Your review was interesting to read.

  9. you know, I don’t like the feeling of PAYING FOR WORK, but I am also getting tired of the constant whining about bid sites. I regularly make 80$ per hour with one client IN MY FAVORITE NICHE that found me on a bid site, and have used me for 3 projects since August.Yes, 90% of the people on bid sites are cheap. But the other 10% are easily discerned in minutes of browsing. I track ALL my hours- every single one- via an Excel spreadsheet. I spend about 2 hours a month on elance. I generally pull about 3 projects per month off elance. I should do some sorts on my spreadsheets and look at the numbers.One downside– if you’re a veteran writer,- but one without feedback, it’ll be hard to get some jobs for your real rate. I kind of avoided this, as I started with elance/GAF/IF when I was a new to FT freelancing, so I didn’t mind. But I wouldn’t recommend it for veterans.

  10. @ Allena – Just so you know where I stand, I *like* eLance. I do. I recommend it despite its quirks and crap. It has decent pay and offers good conditions. RAC isn’t bad. Guru sucks, from what I’ve seen. There are plenty of good bidding sites for writers and it’s just another way to get work. Nothing wrong with them and I support them.

    Hell, it beats surfing Craigslist. At least eLance keeps it all in one place!

  11. @ Allena – I don’t think bidding sites are bad; it depends on how you use them. However, it is demoralizing sometimes to see how little people want to pay for quality writing. That said, no writer is obliged to take a low paying project unless s/he feels it’s worth it for experience, buyer feedback or other reasons.

    @ James – I never got anywhere with Guru (nor with Elance, for that matter). I also find that many projects are double and triple posted, so not bidding on those sites isn’t really hurting me, so far.

  12. I use Get A Freelancer and Rentacoder primarily. And of those, I’ve had the most luck with Rentacoder. I have a good rating and have been doing projects on the site from the beginning. I got started by taking on some ridiculously low paying projects just to get the feedback rating. I am trying to get things started with ifreelance. I know that I would need to do the same thing – take on low paying projects. But I know I can find work elsewhere at this point for what I’m worth so I am not sure it is worth the energy.

  13. I’m working on a project for RAC now. We’ll see how it goes. Some of the prices are ridiculous, but there are also some gems – if you can get them.

  14. mulda

    Getafreelancer is the biggest crap ever. I’m wondering why everyone claims that Indians are computer experts – they’re certainly not. The work you get (bid $10 or $1000, it makes no difference) can be thrown directly into the recycle bin.

    Website creation: Disastrous! Those foreign people have no clue about validation, they never heard about proper design standards and their layouts and designs look like 2001. Actually someone even showed me wrong references to get the task.

    SEO: Had to deal with some company which actually looked serious. I put a sum of $2500 into escrow, the agreement was that the money will be released in steps after the desired google positions have been reached.
    6 months passed! The only thing that happened was to put my german site into a bunch of foreign english useless web directories. The website wasn’t even found in the Top 1000. Great, GAF should issue a refund of the interest they received with my money.

    All in all I can say: If you need some crappy work for low money, go for GAF. Everything which deserves the adjective “serious” should never be posted on GAF. Don’t waste your time with dumb and non-english speaking third-world-morons.

  15. GAF… I agree. On the whole, awful.

    If all employers are prepared to pay is peanuts, then all they’ll get is monkeys.

    As an experienced copywriter it makes me very cross when UK companies post such loony rates of pay on GAF. It devalues my profession.

    A good UK copywriter’ll charge between £35 and £45 an hour. That’s about the same as a decent plumber or plasterer. GAF’s $1 for a 300 word article mentality is lamentable. The problem appears to be that it covers too many disparate geographical areas.

    GAF’s a great model but it’ll only ever work properly for professionals if it is split into common seense economic regions. For instance UK, europe, US, India. We all have different currencies (I particularly dislike working in dollars), we all expect different rates of pay and we use different native languages if, like me, you count American english and US culture as distinct from ours.

    Having said all that, I keep a weather eye open. I’ve managed to find one very nice long term client via GAF. With whom I now have direct contact. So if you have the time, it can be worth trawling through all that shite!

  16. In my experience it is best to begin with a focus on positive reviews opposed to income potential. Sites like GAF are great ways to build clientele while keeping a steady flow of income. Sometimes low income is better than no income.

    If you have a high positive review count then in many cases you will be able to bid higher and still win the project. For the $1 budget buyers, I would suggest sending them a friendly private message telling them that their budget is too low for quality work and explain why they should accept your rate at an ‘x’ amount of dollars. This will work best if you have a high review count and bring your high review count to the potential client attention.

    The catch 22 is that to get a high review count you will have to accept low budget projects.

  17. That’s true on many of the sites; thanks for your tips.

  18. vik

    i joined GAF around 6 months back, and till today i have earned more than $1500. if you have some talent of programming or designing, this is the site to be, easy premium membership, hassle free site & great projects!
    vik

  19. Glad it’s worked so well for you, Vik.

  20. Martin Ford

    I worked on GAF for some months and in general my experience was not so good. It’s a continue fight to get a project because the buyer are more interested in paying less than to have the projects done with quality and some coders don’t bid $1 because it’s not allowed. Most buyers are fraudsters, who want to runaway with your code without paying. In a forum I heard about GetACoder.com and I tried to post bids in some projects that required my skills. In a week I was awarded 2 projects with a nice budget and the buyers were professional and paid on time. So don’t loose your time with GAF.

  21. John

    There's not a day that goes by that I wish I could be rid of GetAFreelancer. I'm a good writer, I've got skill and still haven't reached the zenith of my potential. Unfortunately local legislation prohibits me from receiving money through a PayPal account, which means I'm basically cut off from the world (yes, there is moneybookers.com, but how many buyers will sign up just to pay me?).

    I'm telling you, GAF doesn't care about standards, as long as they get their cut from your hard-earned money. And it's a shame, too – the art of writing being sold for as little as $0.25; buyers only caring about quantity vs. cost instead of quality. Almost makes you hate the internet.

Leave A Comment...

CommentLuv Enabled